{"id":1749,"date":"2024-09-19T22:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-09-20T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/?p=1749"},"modified":"2024-09-14T21:01:45","modified_gmt":"2024-09-15T03:01:45","slug":"a-crossword-for-cppcon-2024-solutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/?p=1749","title":{"rendered":"A Crossword for CppCon 2024 &#8211; Solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As a followup from last week, here&#8217;s an explanation of the CppCon crossword. I&#8217;m going to explain the construction process a bit, as well, so the solutions will be given in order of clue-writing, with some commentary on my thought process. Maybe a few people may find this interesting, I don&#8217;t know. Apologies for length. If you just want the answers, you can search by clue number, or you can just skip to the end for my final thoughts in summary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Now follows several thousand words of unnecessary detail\u2026 definitions are <strong>bold<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>5A<\/strong> ODR violation on reversing <strong>sort<\/strong> = ORDER [Anagram of ODR (&#8220;violation&#8221;) + RE (&#8220;on&#8221;) backwards (&#8220;reversing&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was the first clue that woke me in the middle of the night and planted the idea of a C++ cryptic. I woke up thinking, &#8220;ODR violation sounds like an anagram.&#8221; It&#8217;s only three letters, so it didn&#8217;t take long to run through possibilities, and after I thought of ORDER, the rest of the clue suggested itself. (For those who don&#8217;t know C++, an ODR violation is a scary kind of error in your program. A common term at C++ conferences.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Then I scribbled down another clue that didn&#8217;t actually make it into the crossword, but it&#8217;s a gimme: Herb&#8217;s wise (4). Of course this is suggesting a reference to Herb Sutter. And the answer would be SAGE, a simple double meaning. Not a particularly difficult or interesting clue, and it didn&#8217;t make it into the final grid anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The next clue came to me while driving to the local meetup on Thursday night.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22A<\/strong> Supply computer with day for Tesla <strong>crash report<\/strong> = CORE DUMP [Anagram (&#8220;supply&#8221;) of COMPUTER with D (day) swapped (&#8220;for&#8221;) T (Tesla)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I got thinking about using supply (aka &#8220;in a supple way&#8221;) as an anagram indicator. And I was first thinking of constructions like &#8220;Supply linker with\u2026 \u2026for unknown symbols&#8221;. But LINKER wasn&#8217;t good anagram fodder and didn&#8217;t contain any &#8220;unknown&#8221; (X, Y or Z). So I thought of COMPILER, but that wasn&#8217;t quite right either. Then I realised that CORE DUMP was almost an anagram of COMPUTER, with just the D\/T change. So the clue became:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Supply computer with (something meaning D) for (something meaning T) (something meaning CORE DUMP)&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a while I was stuck, then I thought of Tesla for T and crash report for CORE DUMP. Tesla crash report? That&#8217;s good. Just something plausible to think of for the D. And day was the best fit I could find. Unfortunately abbreviating data to D is not supported by the dictionary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>28A<\/strong> Surprise! RAM <strong>found<\/strong> = BOOT UP [BOO (&#8220;surprise!&#8221;) + TUP (&#8220;RAM&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A reasonable surface that might suggest successfully powering on for the first time? Fairly straightforward decomposition. Using RAM in that clue suggested the next one\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1D<\/strong> <strong>Memory<\/strong> of frozen butter? = STATIC RAM [STATIC (&#8220;frozen&#8221;) + RAM (&#8220;butter&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I wouldn&#8217;t want to use the same word in two clues, or two answers, but I think it&#8217;s OK to do one of each. &#8220;Butter&#8221; meaning ram (thing that butts) is a classic cryptic definition. And the surface perhaps brings to mind spreading butter straight from the fridge, which all Brits have struggled with at some point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At this point I wrote a clue for another word that didn&#8217;t make it into the grid. I would really have liked to include IOTA for lots of reasons &#8211; the algorithm\/APL reference of course, and because I had a well-loved guinea pig by that name (named after the algorithm). But you have to kill your darlings, as they say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Anyway it was a bit tricky, but I wrote an acrostic clue because I thought I should have one &#8212; Incremental output tests: APL leads a little bit (4). Not quite smooth, but good enough given I hadn&#8217;t made the grid yet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So I made the grid. I wanted a couple of 15-letter answers, so they went in first. I was lucky that METAPROGRAMMING is a 15-letter word, but I didn&#8217;t clue it yet! The rest of the answers went in fairly easily with software, but I didn&#8217;t do a great job of the down words, I&#8217;d have liked more 7- and 8-letter entries. But them&#8217;s the breaks. The tradeoff was plenty of C++ references.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After the grid was filled, I started cluing at 1A of course. Now began the real work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1A<\/strong> Small conference perhaps in America can <strong>lead the way<\/strong> = SPEARHEAD [S (&#8220;small&#8221;) + PEAR (&#8220;conference perhaps&#8221;) + HEAD (&#8220;in<br>America can&#8221;, US slang for toilet)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I&#8217;ll admit this was a lazy fill &#8212; I&#8217;d seen the same in two crosswords recently &#8212; and a bit of a lazy clue with &#8220;conference perhaps&#8221; meaning PEAR, but after the passage of time, crosswords appearing coincidentally close doesn&#8217;t really matter, and the surface was really good for the C++ crowd, especially here in Colorado where the other conference is C++Now. The &#8220;in America can&#8221; part was my own and I thought it made a smooth clue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>8A<\/strong> <strong>Try to get<\/strong> excited for power play = APPLY FOR [Anagram (&#8220;excited&#8221;) of FOR + P (&#8220;power&#8221;) + PLAY]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I had APPLY FOR in the grid because it fit and it was two nice C++-suggesting words. The definition was tricky on this one. I spotted that APPLY was almost PLAY and then saw &#8220;power play&#8221; and that was it. Another smooth surface IMHO, even though I&#8217;m not an ice hockey fan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>9A<\/strong> Online university perhaps provided <strong>different conditions<\/strong> = ELSE IF [E (&#8220;online&#8221;) + LSE (&#8220;university&#8221;) + IF (provided)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another couple of C++ keywords, another difficult definition. &#8220;Provided&#8221; was easy enough, but I felt that E-LSE as &#8220;online university&#8221; needed the &#8220;perhaps&#8221;. Decided I&#8217;m not going to do better here, so moved on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>13A<\/strong> Pronoun taken back to contradict <strong>Jason Turner?<\/strong> = YOUTUBER [YOU (&#8220;pronoun&#8221;) + TUBER &#8212; REBUT (&#8220;to contradict&#8221;)<br>reversed (&#8220;taken back&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I had Jason in mind as the definition here when I made the fill. Does the surface suggest a code of conduct row? I don&#8217;t know, but all&#8217;s fair in love and cryptic allusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4D<\/strong> Partnership on fine <strong>wicket?<\/strong> = EWOK [EW (partnership &#8212; East\/West in Bridge) + OK (fine)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I bent the rules on capitalization here &#8212; as I did again in other places &#8212; but I felt OK with that given the short answer and the nice misdirection. The first iteration of this clue had &#8220;partners&#8221;; I revised it to &#8220;partnership&#8221; which I think works better. Got to have at least one cricket reference in the puzzle!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>21D<\/strong> Short Bond movie featuring <strong>Resistance units<\/strong> = OHMS [OHMSS (On Her Majesty&#8217;s Secret Service) made &#8220;short&#8221; by lopping off the last S]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This time I capitalized Resistance to suggest the French Resistance. It just about works? I was in two minds over whether to include &#8220;units&#8221; in the clue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>15A<\/strong> <strong>Fractions<\/strong> of balanced painkillers = RATIONAL NUMBERS [RATIONAL (&#8220;balanced&#8221;) + NUMBERS (&#8220;painkillers&#8221; &#8212; things that numb)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another difficult definition. And &#8220;numbers&#8221; as painkillers is a chestnut. But hey, I didn&#8217;t want to make this thing too hard. Not the best clue, but some surface here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>25A<\/strong> <strong>Line on map<\/strong> is old obstruction = ISOBAR [IS + O (&#8220;old&#8221;) + BAR (&#8220;obstruction&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I struggled over the final word of this clue. &#8220;Barrier&#8221; would have been OK except that it was too close to BAR. At first I had &#8220;limitation&#8221;. But I went with &#8220;obstruction&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">My US friend who tested the puzzle for me liked this clue: &#8220;an obscure word that is very soluble with wordplay.&#8221; I think perhaps ISOBAR is a more familiar word to Brits who are used to seeing weather reports? Not sure. Anyway, it&#8217;s all good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2D<\/strong> Old sound system front of theatre for <strong>Matt Godbolt?<\/strong> = EXPAT [EX (&#8220;old&#8221;) + PA (&#8220;sound system&#8221;) + T (&#8220;front of theatre&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With this word in the fill, I thought of Matt. Well, I couldn&#8217;t put myself in! The charade wrote itself, another fairly easy clue. But that&#8217;s fine. And the surface is OK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>11A<\/strong> <strong>Flawless<\/strong> performance begins with popular tenor = INTACT [IN (&#8220;popular&#8221;) + T (&#8220;tenor&#8221;) + ACT (&#8220;performance&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was the first answer my beta-tester got, and he remarked that he might have expected some reference to &#8220;int&#8221; in the clue. But a smooth surface cannot be thrown away for an inside reference. And I didn&#8217;t want to make the cluing too C++-centric: I thought it best to have a light touch there for accessibility&#8217;s sake. I originally had &#8220;perfect&#8221; as the definition, but I think &#8220;flawless&#8221; works better. I pondered for ages over how to clue the T until I realised tenor was a valid abbreviation. A tea tray moment for the setter!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>19A<\/strong> &#8220;Artful&#8221; German import mag shows <strong>advanced technique<\/strong> = METAPROGRAMMING [Anagram (&#8220;artful&#8221;) of GERMAN IMPORT MAG]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Make or break time. This was a biggie. I&#8217;d done quite a few clues already, and I&#8217;d been putting this off. With such an anchor in the puzzle, I knew I wanted a decent anagram as a help to the solver. I was lucky to find a really nice option. And &#8220;artful&#8221; as the anagram indicator was a good suggestive word. The definition is much too loose for a general crossword, but with the theme and the audience it works for me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What does the surface suggest? That&#8217;s down to you. Moving on&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>32A<\/strong> <strong>Reconstruct<\/strong> toy without hesitation = TRANSFORM [TRANSFORMER (&#8220;toy&#8221;) without ER (&#8220;hesitation&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A tricky collection of letters, but a straightforward clue. Didn&#8217;t spend too long on this one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>7D<\/strong> <strong>Assign<\/strong> to take free shot = REFER [R (&#8220;take&#8221;) + anagram (&#8220;shot&#8221;) of FREE]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Originally I had a different clue: &#8220;Assign either way around&#8221;. I thought that a very weak effort. 5-letter palindromes are fairly common in crosswords and almost always clued with some reference to their palindromic nature. But given that the crossers help so much, I thought a nice surface here was worth a little difficulty (R for &#8220;take&#8221; is not common, but in the dictionary &#8212; from Latin &#8220;recipe&#8221;). The &#8220;to&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite know what it&#8217;s doing in this clue, but I think it&#8217;s OK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Assign&#8221; is actually the first definition given in my copy of Chambers (9th ed), but my beta-tester expressed surprise. Think of a GP referring a patient to a specialist, perhaps. I toyed with other clue ideas (something something about REEFER &#8220;dropping an E&#8221;?) but gave them up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>29A<\/strong> <strong>Left to choice<\/strong>, old friend gets into code = OPTIONAL [O (&#8220;old&#8221;) + TION (anagram of &#8220;into&#8221; with &#8220;code&#8221; as the anagrind) inside PAL (&#8220;friend&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I like the surface here. &#8220;Into&#8221; is commonly anagram fodder because it&#8217;s a common group of letters and an innocuous word in a clue. I looked through a list of anagram indicators and found &#8220;code&#8221;. Great.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>17D<\/strong> Referendum: am I somewhat <strong>tasty<\/strong>? = UMAMI [Hidden (&#8220;somewhat&#8221;) in referendUM AM I]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was a difficult one to clue. Thank goodness the dictionary supports umami as an adjective. Originally I had &#8220;ultimatum&#8221;, but switched to &#8220;referendum&#8221;. I wondered if I could use &#8220;tasteful&#8221; for the definition, but decided to be fair.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>10D<\/strong> <strong>Broken<\/strong> declaration order with new headers = DOWN [Acrostic (&#8220;headers&#8221;) of Declaration Order With New]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was one that I re-clued. Originally I had &#8220;It came off: duck&#8217;s broken&#8221; but that was a bit stilted and very crossword-ese sounding. And without the earlier-mentioned IOTA, I didn&#8217;t have an acrostic clue. Then I spotted that &#8220;headers&#8221; was a C++ term and an acrostic indicator. Cool, and a better surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>26D<\/strong> Try to chuck first <strong>game<\/strong> = BINGO [GO (&#8220;try&#8221;) with BIN (&#8220;chuck&#8221;) first]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I originally had thoughts about using &#8220;house&#8221; as the definition with something suggesting a gaming &#8220;house&#8221;, but I couldn&#8217;t make it work very well without sounding stilted. As with 10D, putting colons in clues is best used very sparingly &#8212; it reeks of crossword-ese to me. The difficulty was suggesting throwing a game while defining BIN, because &#8220;throw&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean BIN without adding &#8220;away&#8221;. But I think &#8220;chuck&#8221; might work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>3D<\/strong> Artistic <strong>fish<\/strong>? = RAY [Double definition: fish, and also Man RAY the artist. Or\u2026]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was only three letters, so I didn&#8217;t feel too bad about a tricky parse. My beta-tester divined Man Ray, which was complete serendipity. I actually had in mind the much more punny &#8220;Royal-Academician-y&#8221;. Either one works!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>16D<\/strong> Look good for the <strong>record<\/strong> = LOG [LO (&#8220;look&#8221;) + G (&#8220;good&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quick write, quick solve I think. Standard abbreviations here. I tend to find short answers either easy or very difficult. And I don&#8217;t want this crossword to be overly difficult.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>24D<\/strong> <strong>Put out<\/strong> dead flower = DOUSE [D (&#8220;dead&#8221;) + OUSE (&#8220;flower&#8221; &#8211; a river)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I originally clued this as &#8220;Flood from dead river&#8221; which I felt didn&#8217;t really work. Rivers aren&#8217;t described as &#8220;dead&#8221;. So the change gives a better surface. Is it a double-indirection to clue &#8220;ouse&#8221; as &#8220;flower&#8221;? Maybe, but I think it&#8217;s OK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>22D<\/strong> <strong>Lead<\/strong> Carbon expert = CABLE [C (&#8220;Carbon&#8221;) + ABLE (&#8220;expert&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pretty straightforward here. A nice surface for the C++ crowd. Am I once more playing a bit fast and loose with capitalization? Oh well. Maybe that&#8217;s my style.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>20D<\/strong> <strong>Self-confidence<\/strong> is for instance ordinary = EGO [EG (&#8220;for instance&#8221;) + O (&#8220;ordinary&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another quick one. Maybe alluding to being a public speaker? I don&#8217;t know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>23D<\/strong> <strong>Red<\/strong> river? Yes, in Germany! = RIOJA [RIO (&#8220;river&#8221;) + JA (&#8220;yes&#8221; in German)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This one got a tick from my beta-tester. Rioja seems to come up now and then in crosswords. Pretty much a write-in here, I think. Cluing RIO as &#8220;river&#8221; rather than &#8220;Spanish river&#8221; or similar is bending the rules again &#8212; might it be easier for a US audience than a UK one, I wonder? &#8212; but given the obviousness of JA I think it&#8217;s OK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>12D<\/strong> Backspace stops nonsense in <strong>printed matter<\/strong> = TONER [Reversal (&#8220;back&#8221;) of EN (&#8220;space&#8221;) in ROT (&#8220;nonsense&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A tricky parse, this &#8212; the only one my tester couldn&#8217;t explain, although he got the right answer from the crossers and the definition. So doable. The fill gave me a reasonable choice between TUNER and TONER. I first had thoughts about something involving black powder (alluding to gunpowder) but ended up with a better surface. It&#8217;s reasonably common in some crosswords to have to separate words (or even separate single letters) although I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s Ximenean?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>30D<\/strong> The only <strong>header<\/strong> needed for iPhone development? = IOS [A not-very-cryptic definition, referring to the standard header and iOS]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A pretty weak clue for a pretty weak fill. I had a choice between things like IDS (meh) or IFS (nope, given 9A) and plumped for IOS. Oh well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>6D<\/strong> <strong>Nerd<\/strong> with double-E enthralled by database = DWEEB [W (&#8220;with&#8221;) + EE (&#8220;double-E&#8221;) inside (&#8220;enthralled by&#8221;) DB (&#8220;database&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At first I didn&#8217;t know how to clue this. There was very limited choice over the definition. Then I spotted &#8220;with double-E&#8221; &#8212; I work with folks who have Electrical Engineering degrees and use the term &#8220;double-E&#8221; all the time. DB for database isn&#8217;t actually in the dictionary (!) but DBMS is\u2026 so I thought it OK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>27D<\/strong> <strong>They might give u<\/strong> a map problem = MPAA [Anagram (&#8220;problem&#8221;) of A MAP]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was another tricky fill. SPCA was a possibility but I went with MPAA because it&#8217;s a bit more tech-industry adjacent, or at least more familiar as the enforcer of copyrights. I was stuck on how to clue it &#8212; the crossword software I used suggests lots of uninspired quick-type clues &#8212; but &#8220;it\/they might\u2026&#8221; is a classic definition construction, even though I had to resort to &#8220;u&#8221;. It probably helps the surface that the notorious think-cell interview process was<br>recently in C++ news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I thought this clue easy, given the constrained fill, but my beta-tester got tunnel vision and had a hard time, rating it as a favourite when he got it. Was it fair to leave the enumeration as (4) rather than (1,1,1,1)? Maybe not, but I just didn&#8217;t notice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>14D<\/strong> <strong>Appreciation<\/strong> of present delivered in bow = EAR [Sounds like &#8216;ERE, which is &#8220;present&#8221; (HERE) as spoken (&#8220;delivered&#8221;) in Bow (East London)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is my favourite of the late clues, even though I bent the capitalization rules again. A non-obvious definition, a nice surface and the classic element of the cockney homophone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>18D<\/strong> LAMP gurus engineered <strong>sweet<\/strong> kudos = SUGARPLUM [Technically a triple: sweet (candy), kudos (compliment) and an anagram (&#8220;engineered&#8221;) of LAMP gurus]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Almost there! And another hard one to clue. And actually the solver (including my tester) might first go for SUGAR LUMP. But that would be (5-4) rather than (9). At least according to my physical copy of Chambers, 9th ed. And according to Merriam-Webster online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Is the LAMP stack still a known thing? I&#8217;m not sure. This clue might have worked better 15 years ago. As is, it&#8217;s a bit of a filler.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>5D<\/strong> <strong>Chick<\/strong> takes some hotel work on the counter = OWLET [Hidden in (&#8220;some&#8221;) hoTEL WOrk backwards (&#8220;on the counter&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Is it me, or does &#8220;on the counter&#8221; sound like something Fed would use (probably alluding to football)? This was getting late in the process and I was wanting to get to the finish line. &#8220;Small hooter&#8221; was a possible definition for a while but I couldn&#8217;t really make it work &#8212; I tried an acrostic clue but it wasn&#8217;t happening. Not to mention the fact that it was a corny definition. Then I thought of being at CppCon in the hotel and realised the reverse hidden of &#8220;hotel work&#8221;. The rest of the clue followed. &#8220;At the counter&#8221; might have been a better surface, but didn&#8217;t work otherwise. &#8220;On the counter&#8221; works just well enough, I think.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I had Conor Hoekstra and his fianc\u00e9e in mind with this fill. They love owls, and we&#8217;ve been swapping bird pictures lately. Not that it affected the clue, mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Also, &#8220;chick&#8221; isn&#8217;t a word I use for a woman in real life, but again, all&#8217;s fair in crossword allusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>31A<\/strong> Facility has run-in with <strong>censor<\/strong> = ERASE [EASE (&#8220;facility&#8221;) containing R (&#8220;run&#8221;)]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final clue! The construction demanded that I find a definition that worked as a noun and a verb, and censor fits the bill. An anagram wasn&#8217;t really going to happen given the letters, so &#8220;run-in&#8221; was a good thought to fit with the metonymy (if that&#8217;s the term I want) of &#8220;facility&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Final thoughts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Overall, I&#8217;m happy. Some nice surfaces and I don&#8217;t mind some being easy; in fact that&#8217;s much preferable to the alternative, given the target audience. I really wanted a good mix of easy ways in with a few more devious clues. My job as a setter is to put up a good fight but lose gracefully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get better at setting as I practice more. And although I am an avid solver, I suspect I don&#8217;t have the breadth of experience necessary to know if I&#8217;m being unwittingly hackneyed in some areas. I was quite conscious of what I think is a common trap for new setters: making everything anagrams. So only 3 clues are &#8220;pure&#8221; anagrams with another 4 or so being partials. That&#8217;ll do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The down clue lengths in the grid aren&#8217;t great; that&#8217;s a tradeoff of getting the theme words in I suppose. Maybe I could have done a better fill. I didn&#8217;t spend that long on it. I did actually remove two words: at first I had ANIMA and BIMBO in the grid (as down clues, to the right of TONER and left of UMAMI respectively). I decided the grid had a lot of clues already; it probably still has more than average. I didn&#8217;t much like the words, and in my estimation they<br>weren&#8217;t needed for checking 15A and 19A, so I just removed them. I would perhaps have kept ANIMATE or something in that position, but there was no fill for U.B.M.O to match up. &#8220;UB BY MDO&#8221; is nonsense even if you manage to somehow accept an assertion that MDO may mean &#8220;most derived object&#8221;. Anyway, I&#8217;m aware some publications use a set of standard grids; maybe I&#8217;ll do that in future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What I really went for was good surfaces as much as I could. Sorry to say, but I think there have been some shockingly bad surfaces in recent Guardian crosswords. RIP Nutmeg, truly missed. I think I did pretty well overall &#8212; even on some of the theme clues like 5A, 10D and 29A. Smoothest surface? Maybe 8A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">My favourite clue might be 14D, which I really like despite the capitalization of &#8220;bow&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">3D was my most groanworthy clue, although not so much with the alternative interpretation found by my beta-tester! I don&#8217;t suppose it&#8217;s that original though.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Best all-rounder probably has to go to 19A: a nice &#8220;feature&#8221; fill, a good anagram, a nice surface and a good difficulty help-out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Many thanks to Scott and Tristan for their help, and thanks to everyone who tried the puzzle! I hope you found something to like.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a followup from last week, here&#8217;s an explanation of the CppCon crossword. I&#8217;m going to explain the construction process a bit, as well, so the solutions will be given in order of clue-writing, with some commentary on my thought process. Maybe a few people may find this interesting, I&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cpp","category-games"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1749"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1749\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1769,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1749\/revisions\/1769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.elbeno.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}