Skip to content
Why is a raven like a writing desk?

Thoughts both confusing and enlightening.

Why is a raven like a writing desk?

Thoughts both confusing and enlightening.

How to print anything in C++ (postscript)

elbeno, 2 February, 201530 June, 2015

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Postscript

Refactoring! My initial plan for customizing opener/closer/separator for containers turned out to be unwieldy: I realized that it wouldn’t be possible for me to provide default specializations and also allow clients to specialize. Also, you may have noticed that the code for printing pairs, tuples, strings and arrays didn’t allow for customization at all. So I reworked the customization, allowing a formatter object as a parameter to prettyprint() and providing a default one:

template 
inline stringifier, default_formatter>
prettyprint(T&& t)
{
  return stringifier, default_formatter>(
      std::forward(t), default_formatter());
}

template 
inline stringifier, F>
prettyprint(T&& t, F&& f)
{
  return stringifier, F>(
      std::forward(t), std::forward(f));
}

The default_formatter looks like this:

struct default_formatter
{
  // default separator, opener and closer
  template 
  constexpr const char* separator(const T&) const
  { return ","; }

  template 
  constexpr const char* opener(const T&) const
  { return "{"; }

  template 
  constexpr const char* closer(const T&) const
  { return "}"; }

  // use [] for vectors
  template 
  constexpr const char* opener(const std::vector&) const
  { return "["; }

  template 
  constexpr const char* closer(const std::vector&) const
  { return "]"; }

  // etc (more omitted)
  ...
};

And now I can pass the formatter object through to each specialization of stringifier_select, and use it appropriately for pairs, tuples, strings and arrays, as well as iterables. When I want to override the formatter, I simply specify a new formatter type, implement the opener/closer/separator functions for the type in question the way I want to, and pass an instance to prettyprint.

C++ Programming

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Compile-time RNG tricks

15 October, 201518 October, 2015

(Start at the beginning of the series – and all the source can be found in my github repo) Compile-time random number generation is quite useful. For instance, we could generate GUIDs (version 4 UUIDs): namespace cx { struct guid_t { uint32_t data1; uint16_t data2; uint16_t data3; uint64_t data4; };…

Read More

Development of an Algorithm

21 June, 201722 June, 2017

Here’s an exercise: given a nice piece of code sitting in a file, how do you take that code and make it generic, in the style of an STL algorithm? For our example, let’s consider an algorithm that isn’t (yet) in the STL. First, the problem it solves. Imagine that…

Read More

Lisping towards enlightenment

17 December, 200729 December, 2007

Me: a C/C++ programmer of 12 years (professionally), a Lisp dabbler (programmer is too strong a word to use here) of, let’s say ~3 months. I’ve done enough functional stuff to be comfortable with that side, but I haven’t (hadn’t) yet written a project big enough to get me used…

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2026 Why is a raven like a writing desk? | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes